Skip to content

Use Fast mode for Pi web search - #49

Merged
georgeatparallel merged 1 commit into
parallel-web:mainfrom
anirudhmehra:fix/pi-extension-fast-search
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

Use Fast mode for Pi web search#49
georgeatparallel merged 1 commit into
parallel-web:mainfrom
anirudhmehra:fix/pi-extension-fast-search

Conversation

@anirudhmehra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • switch Pi web_search requests from advanced to fast
  • upgrade parallel-web from 0.5.0 to 1.3.0, whose GA Search types include Fast mode
  • correct the README's stale basic mode note
  • add a real-SDK request test that verifies mode: "fast" reaches /v1/search

Why Fast

Parallel's current Search mode guidance positions Fast for high-quality interactive agent search within a one-second budget. At current list prices, Fast costs $1 per 1,000 requests versus $5 for Basic or Advanced.

The Artificial Analysis Search API leaderboard reports:

  • Fast: 73 Search Index, 17.0s per task
  • Basic: 73 Search Index, 24.3s per task
  • Advanced: 75 Search Index, 39.5s per task

That makes Fast a better default for Pi's interactive web-search tool while retaining near-Advanced aggregate quality. Advanced remains available to direct SDK consumers for multi-hop background research.

The extension currently has documentation drift: its README says Basic, while its implementation hardcodes Advanced. This change aligns both on Fast.

Verification

  • pnpm test:ci
  • pnpm lint
  • pnpm format:check
  • pnpm typecheck
  • pnpm build

@anirudhmehra
anirudhmehra requested a review from a team August 25, 2026 04:33
@anirudhmehra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@georgeatparallel can you please take a look? Artificial Analysis Search API leaderboard puts Parallel at the top and lots of people will want the best functionality out of the Pi extension, soon.

@georgeatparallel
georgeatparallel merged commit 9394b85 into parallel-web:main Aug 26, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants